chore: update celery latest version to 5.6.3 by dd-octo-sts[bot] · Pull Request #19328 · DataDog/dd-trace-py

dd-octo-sts · 2026-07-28T00:46:36Z

Update celery lockfiles and dependency package lockfiles.
This performs the following updates:

Some celery locks use celery latest. This updates that package and its dependencies.
Some locks pin celery but use the latest version of another package. This updates those dependencies.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-28T00:47:35Z

Circular import analysis

⚠️ Existing circular imports

There are 1 circular imports that already exist on the base branch and have not been changed by this PR.

ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.bytecode_injector -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.callbacks -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.collector -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.bytecode_reporting -> ddtrace.errortracking._handled_exceptions.bytecode_injector

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-28T00:48:33Z

Codeowners resolved as

Resolved from the full PR diff against main using the target branch CODEOWNERS file.
CODEOWNERS team requests not listed below are not required by the current file set.

.riot/requirements/1509aa1.txt                                          @DataDog/apm-python
.riot/requirements/19507e4.txt                                          @DataDog/apm-python
.riot/requirements/1df4aa0.txt                                          @DataDog/apm-python
.riot/requirements/1edaced.txt                                          @DataDog/apm-python
.riot/requirements/654f8c0.txt                                          @DataDog/apm-python
.riot/requirements/c61da82.txt                                          @DataDog/apm-python
.riot/requirements/dbc6a48.txt                                          @DataDog/apm-python
scripts/integration_registry/registry.yaml                              @DataDog/apm-idm-python
supported_versions.json                                                 @DataDog/python-guild @DataDog/apm-idm-python

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 47ecc15bbe

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

datadog-prod-us1-6 · 2026-07-28T00:54:11Z

✨ Unblock PR with BitsAI

❌ Errors

Your PR has failed checks. Please review the issues below and take necessary action before merging.

🚦 2 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | contrib/celery 1/4 — 🔧 Needs a code fix, caused by this PR

View more details · View in GitLab

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | contrib/celery 2/4 — 🔧 Needs a code fix, caused by this PR

View more details · View in GitLab

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 33449a2 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!}

pr-commenter · 2026-07-28T01:16:17Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-10-06 01:21:11

Comparing candidate commit 33449a2 in PR branch upgrade-latest-celery-version with baseline commit 9480aea in branch main.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 608 metrics, 10 unstable metrics, 8 known flaky benchmarks, 16 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:httppropagationextract-empty_headers

🟥 execution_time [+103.807ns; +125.927ns] or [+14.171%; +17.191%]

scenario:iastaspects-format_noaspect

🟥 execution_time [+42.218µs; +49.458µs] or [+14.189%; +16.623%]

scenario:iastaspectsremodule-re_expand_aspect

🟥 execution_time [+87.098µs; +96.771µs] or [+13.762%; +15.290%]

scenario:msgpackencoderscenario-simple_one_span

🟥 execution_time [+422.754ns; +492.767ns] or [+10.073%; +11.741%]

scenario:openfeatureflagevaluation-hook-enqueue-typical

🟥 execution_time [+1.766µs; +1.929µs] or [+8.265%; +9.029%]

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:coreapiscenario-context_with_data_listeners

unstable execution_time [-741.640ns; +728.730ns] or [-7.098%; +6.975%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_1_listener

unstable execution_time [-35.574ns; +42.223ns] or [-5.333%; +6.330%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_50_listeners

unstable execution_time [-1915.826ns; +1934.970ns] or [-9.556%; +9.652%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_exception_listeners

unstable execution_time [-1672.045ns; +1898.701ns] or [-8.822%; +10.018%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_listeners

unstable execution_time [-383.935ns; +375.814ns] or [-8.922%; +8.733%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_no_args_listeners

unstable execution_time [-212.465ns; +247.452ns] or [-7.846%; +9.138%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_with_results_1_listener

unstable execution_time [-101.489ns; +90.555ns] or [-7.280%; +6.496%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_with_results_50_listeners

unstable execution_time [-5062.905ns; +4241.238ns] or [-10.431%; +8.738%]

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_with_results_listeners

unstable execution_time [-1068.942ns; +841.590ns] or [-10.312%; +8.119%]

scenario:packagesupdateimporteddependencies-import_many_stdlib_cached

unstable execution_time [-56.496µs; +52.536µs] or [-9.928%; +9.232%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:httppropagationinject-ids_only

🟥 execution_time [+2.983µs; +3.112µs] or [+20.800%; +21.703%]

scenario:iastaspects-lower_aspect

🟥 execution_time [+101.138µs; +105.777µs] or [+42.022%; +43.949%]

scenario:iastaspects-upper_noaspect

🟥 execution_time [+37.761µs; +42.781µs] or [+22.113%; +25.053%]

scenario:iastaspectsospath-ospathbasename_aspect

🟥 execution_time [+150.123µs; +154.744µs] or [+40.274%; +41.514%]

scenario:iastaspectssplit-rsplit_aspect

🟥 execution_time [+25.903µs; +30.274µs] or [+16.800%; +19.635%]

scenario:span-start

🟥 execution_time [+1.156ms; +1.584ms] or [+9.054%; +12.403%]

scenario:telemetryaddmetric-1-count-metric-1-times

🟥 execution_time [+266.794ns; +297.547ns] or [+13.648%; +15.222%]

scenario:tracer-small

🟥 execution_time [+42.165µs; +43.595µs] or [+17.173%; +17.755%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

scenario:errortrackingflasksqli-baseline
scenario:flasksimple-iast-get
scenario:iastaspects-casefold_aspect
scenario:iastaspects-casefold_noaspect
scenario:iastaspects-index_aspect
scenario:iastaspects-ljust_noaspect
scenario:iastaspects-replace_aspect
scenario:iastaspects-rstrip_aspect
scenario:iastaspects-swapcase_aspect
scenario:iastaspects-title_noaspect
scenario:iastaspects-translate_aspect
scenario:iastaspects-translate_noaspect
scenario:packagespackageforrootmodulemapping-cache_off
scenario:packagespackageforrootmodulemapping-cache_on
scenario:sethttpmeta-all-enabled
scenario:telemetryaddmetric-record-100-metrics

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-08-14T00:38:50Z

Dependency direction analysis

⚠️ Existing dependency direction violations

There are 201 dependency direction violations that already exist on the base branch and have not been changed by this PR.

Show existing violations (showing 5 of 201 highest severity)

ddtrace.internal.tracemethods -×-> ddtrace.trace  (internal-core -> product:tracing, score=132)
ddtrace.internal.ci_visibility.recorder -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:ci_visibility -> product:tracing, score=130)
ddtrace.llmobs._integrations.mcp -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:llmobs -> product:tracing, score=130)
ddtrace.internal.test_visibility.api -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:ci_visibility -> product:tracing, score=130)
ddtrace.llmobs._integrations.anthropic -×-> ddtrace.trace  (product:llmobs -> product:tracing, score=130)

To see all violations, download the layers-base.json and layers-pr.json artifacts from this CI job and run:
uv run --script scripts/import-analysis/layers.py compare layers-base.json layers-pr.json

linear-code · 2026-09-04T19:38:24Z

AIF-5

emmettbutler · 2026-09-09T17:56:39Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-09-09T17:56:44Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-09 17:56:44 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-09-09 17:56:51 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-09-09 22:19:25 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-10-06T00:49:32Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-06T00:53:25.258090Z	`33449a2`	New commits

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

dd-octo-sts Bot added the changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. label Jul 28, 2026

dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from a team as code owners July 28, 2026 00:46

dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from florentinl, juanjux and wconti27 July 28, 2026 00:46

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .riot/requirements/1edaced.txt

emmettbutler force-pushed the upgrade-latest-celery-version branch from d51a841 to 84cf1b2 Compare August 4, 2026 16:17

emmettbutler approved these changes Aug 4, 2026

View reviewed changes

dd-octo-sts Bot force-pushed the upgrade-latest-celery-version branch from 84cf1b2 to fd7e5f2 Compare August 14, 2026 00:36

emmettbutler approved these changes Aug 19, 2026

View reviewed changes

dubloom mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2026

chore: update django latest version to 6.1 #19236

Closed

dubloom approved these changes Aug 21, 2026

View reviewed changes

dd-octo-sts Bot force-pushed the upgrade-latest-celery-version branch from f83f887 to e6d2e64 Compare September 4, 2026 00:43

wconti27 force-pushed the upgrade-latest-celery-version branch from e8ebc6e to 944c0ac Compare September 8, 2026 18:26

wconti27 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2026 18:26

wconti27 force-pushed the upgrade-latest-celery-version branch from 944c0ac to c775c0c Compare September 8, 2026 18:31

emmettbutler approved these changes Sep 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

Update package version

33449a2

dd-octo-sts Bot force-pushed the upgrade-latest-celery-version branch from 231dd99 to 33449a2 Compare October 6, 2026 00:49

Conversation

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Circular import analysis

⚠️ Existing circular imports

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codeowners resolved as

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 • edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

❌ Errors

ℹ️ Info

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

scenario:httppropagationextract-empty_headers

scenario:iastaspects-format_noaspect

scenario:iastaspectsremodule-re_expand_aspect

scenario:msgpackencoderscenario-simple_one_span

scenario:openfeatureflagevaluation-hook-enqueue-typical

Unstable benchmarks

scenario:coreapiscenario-context_with_data_listeners

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_1_listener

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_50_listeners

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_exception_listeners

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_listeners

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_no_args_listeners

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_with_results_1_listener

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_with_results_50_listeners

scenario:coreapiscenario-core_dispatch_with_results_listeners

scenario:packagesupdateimporteddependencies-import_many_stdlib_cached

Known flaky benchmarks

scenario:httppropagationinject-ids_only

scenario:iastaspects-lower_aspect

scenario:iastaspects-upper_noaspect

scenario:iastaspectsospath-ospathbasename_aspect

scenario:iastaspectssplit-rsplit_aspect

scenario:span-start

scenario:telemetryaddmetric-1-count-metric-1-times

scenario:tracer-small

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Aug 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Dependency direction analysis

⚠️ Existing dependency direction violations

Uh oh!

linear-code Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Uh oh!

emmettbutler commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 •

edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Aug 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading